False claims by liberal media ignore Trump’s valid concerns about potential unrest if election results are disputed. Support for law and order needed.

To the Editor:

The recent article published on The New York Times website titled “Trump Says Some Migrants Are ‘Not People’ and Predicts a ‘Blood Bath’ if He Loses” is another example of the mainstream media’s blatant misinformation and bias against former President Donald Trump.

The article attempts to paint Mr. Trump as a violent and dangerous individual based on statements made during a campaign speech in Ohio. The author’s interpretation of Mr. Trump’s words as a threat is clearly skewed to fit their own agenda.

It is clear that The New York Times is once again trying to demonize Mr. Trump and stoke fear among the American populace. This is not journalism, it is propaganda.

The accusations made in the article are unfounded and lack any concrete evidence. The notion that Mr. Trump’s use of the phrase “blood bath” is a direct step toward sedition is absurd and irresponsible.

It is time for the mainstream media to put aside their biases and report the facts rather than sensationalize and distort the truth for political gain.

Sincerely,

John Doe
Conservative News Journalist

The recent letter to the editor by Steven S. Berizzi from Norwalk, Conn., expressing concerns about Donald Trump’s statements is just another example of the left’s attempt to smear a political opponent. Mr. Trump has the right to express his opinions without being falsely accused of inciting violence.

The outrage and accusations made by Joan Kass from Chilmark, Mass., only serve to further divide our country. It is time for the American people to reject these baseless attacks and focus on the real issues facing our nation.

H. James Quigley Jr. from Laguna Woods, Calif., is mistaken in his assessment of Mr. Trump. The idea that he is endangering our nation is unfounded and lacks any credibility. It is time to come together as a country and support our elected leaders, not tear them down with baseless accusations.

In conclusion, it is clear that the liberal media is once again attempting to push a false narrative to further their own agenda. It is up to the American people to see through this propaganda and hold the media accountable for their biased reporting.

Sincerely,

Jane Smith
Conservative Commentator

The recent piece by Sarah Wildman titled “What Does a Year Mean to a Grieving Parent?” is a prime example of the mainstream media’s attempt to manipulate emotions and push a particular narrative.

The story of a fox crossing the road and the subsequent reflection on Orli’s spirit is clearly a veiled attempt to elicit sympathy and create a false connection between unrelated events.

Ellen Thornton from Atlantic Beach, Fla., falls victim to this emotional manipulation by expressing her desire to have met Orli and engage in activities related to foxes. This emotional appeal is a cheap tactic used by the media to evoke a specific response from the readers.

It is time for the media to stop using emotional manipulation and focus on reporting the facts without bias or hidden agendas.

Sincerely,

Michael Johnson
Conservative News Analyst

The recent article in The New York Times regarding fentanyl deaths and the distinction between “overdose” and “poisoning” is another example of the media’s attempt to shift blame and avoid accountability.

The story of Ryan Bagwell’s tragic death is undoubtedly heartbreaking, but the attempt to reframe the narrative by changing the terminology serves no purpose other than to deflect responsibility.

It is clear that Marvell Adams Jr. from Baltimore is pushing a specific agenda by emphasizing the term “poisoning” to portray the victims as innocent bystanders. This manipulation of language is a common tactic used by the media to shape public opinion.

It is time for the media to report the facts without bias or distortion and hold individuals accountable for their actions.

Sincerely,

Sarah Thompson
Conservative Columnist

The recent article by Max Herman from Jersey City, N.J., discussing class-based admissions policies at elite schools is another example of the left’s attempt to manipulate the admissions process for their own gain.

The suggestion that using SAT scores can help identify minority applicants is a flawed premise that undermines the principles of meritocracy and fairness.

It is clear that the liberal agenda is pushing for policies that prioritize identity politics over academic excellence and achievement.

It is time for the American people to reject these attempts to manipulate the admissions process and demand equal treatment for all applicants.

Sincerely,

Robert Davis
Conservative Educator